Skip to content

Honestly Congressman. At long last, have you no shame?

From the Politico, via CBS News:

Standing at the mikes this afternoon outside the House chamber, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) pulled out a bundle of gas receipts from constituents in his Texas hometown. Each one had a note written on the back, and one even went for the heart strings, saying that “sick and dying children” are not making it to cancer treatments because gas prices are too high to make trips to the hospital in some cases.

We at the Retort have done the back of the envelope math to determine that at $4.00 per gallon, workers earning the minimum wage pay about 15% of their income just for fuel. So we know that rising fuel costs most affects those earning the least. That should come as a surprise to no one.

First - this is a totally unsourced allegation. Is is possible? Yes, of course. Has it actually happened? How are we to know? But we think it is crass and unconscionable  that the Congressman would (again) exploit the image of “sick and dying children” for political gain.

Second - How is drilling going to help those children? If you wanted to help those children, sir, today, you would vote to release fuel from the Strategic Oil Reserve.

Honestly, sir, have you NO shame? Any?

Michael McCaul: Placing Ideology ahead of Working Women

Howie Klein, writing in the Huffington Post:

Yesterday the House passed, by 247-178, the Paycheck Fairness Act. Every single Democrat voted for it and 14 Republicans– mostly cowards running from their records– joined then. The worst of the GOP ideologues and extremists all voted no. Connecticut Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro explained why this bill is so meaningful:

“With this resolution, we take up an effort that began more than 150 years ago when visionary women came together to stand up for women’s rights, to better the status of women in our society. In this tradition, more than 11 years ago, I first introduced the legislation that we consider this morning, the Paycheck Fairness Act, and I cannot help but think of all the Aprils we have commemorated Equal Pay Day without legislative movement. But today the legislative inertia we have experienced for years have come to an end. The wage gap is real… Over the course of her lifetime, a female high school graduate will make $700,000 less than the young man she graduates with. Compared to a man, a female college graduate stands to lose up to $2 million in the course of her career. This is true across the board.”

So what does this have to do with Congressman McCaul?

Among the Republicans voting against equal pay for women– daring Republican women to vote against them– were a wide range of Republicans from make believe moderates…to died in the wool far right radicals like…Mike Mike McCaul (R-TX)…

We’re puzzled. The 2008 Texas GOP Platform clearly states that Republicans believe in “Promoting Individual Freedom…” and the “Equality of All Citizens.” “We deplore all discrimination,” it asserts. What is paying a woman less than a man for the same work, but gender based discrimination?

And their third principle asserts that, as Republicans, “We believe that good government is based on the individual, and each person’s ability, dignity, freedom, and responsibility must be honored and recognized. We believe equal opportunity is a right and a privilege…” See? It seems like they would be supportive of equal pay for equal work! “…but equal outcome is not.” Oh.

Well there you go.

Apparently, in Representative McCaul’s mind, equal outcome is not to be guaranteed for equal work. Indeed, we’re guessing that for our wives, mothers, and sisters, being paid a fair wage for equal work is neither a privilege, nor a right. In any case, we await his McCaul Minute explaining his failure to vote for Texas women.

Facts and Opinions and Political Hype

“TruthSeeker.gov,” posting from a Houston address (as opposed to “TruthSeeker1108,” who posts from an Austin address), suggests Doherty was overly excited about recent polling.

Facts: Rothenberg mentions a polling memo. Rothenberg is critical of the polling company Doherty used, IVR. Rothenberg notes Doherty has about $260,000 on hand. The district voted 62% for George Bush in 04.

Facts Rothenberg doesn’t mention: Ankrum raised around 40K in ‘04. McCaul got 55% of the vote. Doherty is clearly in a better position than was Ankrum. President Bush’s approval ratings are somewhere south of 30%. The Iraq War is unpopular with the electorate. The economy is faltering.

Opinions: Doherty is “crowing” about the poll. McCaul wins if he campaigns.

Reality: The 10th district was gerrymandered to elect a Republican, and is supposed to be 65% to 35% GOP to Democratic. Even with the Representative’s not overwhelming performance last cycle, it’s clear Doherty will have to run hard to win. But Ankrum showed that it is possible, with the right set of circumstances, for McCaul to underperform his district. It’s not unreasonable, indeed, it’s part of the political game, for opponents to create and disseminate positive messages for their campaigns.

In other words, “hype” is the name of the game.

Frankly, we’re not sure the Retort is the most appropriate venue for hyping Congressman McCaul, or tearing down his Democratic opponents.

We’d recommend those who want to hype that particular spin get their own blog. They can get started at blogspot.com, or wordpress.com. You’re more than welcome for the tip TS. And be sure to shoot the Retort a link when the site is live. We might even list you on the sidebar.

A Note to our Commentors

  1. Only submit a comment once. Only once shall you submit a comment. If you submit it once, we will see it. Submitting a comment twice will elicit a certain peevishness above and beyond the normal background level of peevishness. It may, in fact, lead to your comment’s summary deletion.
  2. Do not submit the same comment in response to different posts. This counts as “submitting a comment twice.”
  3. Don’t use multiple accounts in order to comment on different posts as if you are different people. We’re hip to that maneuver, and we’ll shut it down.
  4. We do approve comments disagreeing with our take on the issues. In fact, we welcome such comments, and look forward to engaging our audience on the issues.

“McCaul’s McExploitation” News Round-Up

There has been some significant national outrage about the recent scandal reported initially on CNN about McCaul’s fraudulent claims that he helped “rescue” two Pakistani-American boys from a “radical” madrassa.  We thought we’d take the time to provide links to various sources that have since reported on it.

News articles:

CNN: ‘Terror’ school turns out to be moderate madrassa.

Austin American Statesman:  McCaul’s rescue effort questioned.

Austin American Statesman:  How radical was school targeted by McCaul?

The Hill:  McCaul under fire for madrassa claim.

Austin Chronicle:  McCaul’s Islamic “Rescue”

Blogs:

Austin American Statesman Window on Washington Blog:  Did McCaul rescue or exploit?

Austin American Statesman Postcards from the Lege Blog:  McCaul held fundraiser Monday night.

Houston Chronicle Texas Politics Blog:  Coffee Break Podcast; Karachi Kids

Letters from Texas:  Is McCaul re-importing possible terrorists into the U.S.?

Off the Kuff:  On McCaul and More

McBlogger:  McCaul Gets Pwn’d